Thumb your nose at tidy conclusions.
Jun. 11th, 2007 05:44 pmLOL...Moore finally comes out of hiding to post this on his SciFi blog.
Funny enough, I had the exact same reaction to the end of the final Sopranos episode...I rewound my Tivo, thinking there was a tech glitch. I was shocked. And I admired the amazing balls on David Chase. WHOA. Best TV Ending Evah. (It may even top my previous Best Ending Period: the final 20 seconds of Richard Linklater's film Before Sunset.)
Oh and, if it's not obvious: any of you BSG lovers out there who are big fans of "tidy conclusions," be afraid.
Be very afraid.
Funny enough, I had the exact same reaction to the end of the final Sopranos episode...I rewound my Tivo, thinking there was a tech glitch. I was shocked. And I admired the amazing balls on David Chase. WHOA. Best TV Ending Evah. (It may even top my previous Best Ending Period: the final 20 seconds of Richard Linklater's film Before Sunset.)
Oh and, if it's not obvious: any of you BSG lovers out there who are big fans of "tidy conclusions," be afraid.
Be very afraid.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:45 pm (UTC)I loved AJ this season, and the actor who played him just blew me away. The look on his face when his friends poured acid on that guy's toe. The way AJ was playing his parent, his therapists. His apparently honest hesitance to make it with his underage friend/GF and the ensuing fire (LOL). His false earnestness, which was continuously being revealed as yet more excuses to be a slacker and get another day of his Mom's cooking.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 11:16 pm (UTC)I demand a satisfying ending!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:47 pm (UTC)I think we need to remember, that "satisfying" and "tidy" are not the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 07:58 pm (UTC)an ending doesn't have to be tidy but i agree with bop, it does have to be at least emotionally satisfying
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 12:31 am (UTC)OMG! You are a Before Sunrise/Sunset girl, too?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:46 pm (UTC)Yeah, I love those films, and that ending to the second one is just BRILLIANT.
Before this Sopranos ending, the final shots of Six Feet Under and Angel: The Series were my favorites from TV.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 05:02 pm (UTC)You know they (i.e., Julie, Ethen, and Richard) already planned to do another sequel when they shot that second one, right? *grin*
I was ecstatic when I learned Before Sunrise was to have a sequel, then went "HUH?" when Celine told Jesse "you are going to miss that plane, baby." For someone who likes the world neat and orderly, I want closures. Yet as days (and years) gone by, my love for that film (and the ending) grow.
Which is what I think will happen with BSG. I made my friend ask my "happy ending" question at the All Access event, and was subsequently bummed out by RDM's answer. Then I thought about it some more. Do I want RDM to slap on an ending that is consistent, neither thematically nor narratively, to the overall story? The answer is no. Because then I wouldn't be able to love the show in the years to come, and I want to.
My friend told me that RDM took some time to deliberate before answering her (my) question at the All Access; his latest blog entry tells me he is now (or has been) giving this issue some serious thought. That is all I need, because I just know whatever he ends up delivering will be satisfying to me in the long run. (I am such a squeeing fangirl.)
So, no, I am not afraid; I in fact feel quite sanguine. Thanks for the link.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 07:42 pm (UTC)Yes, I'm getting that sense - which is good, and makes sense since they're breaking the final 5-10 eps now, aren't they. I know this thing could go just about anywhere now...and I am ready. BRING IT!!!
You know they (i.e., Julie, Ethen, and Richard) already planned to do another sequel when they shot that second one, right?
WHA? A 3rd one? Really? Any news on that yet, I had no idea. I really love those films, they're real, heartfelt, bittersweet and hopelessly romantic.
The end of the second one is...well...it is rare to get that sort of ending: tantalizing and open to interpretation, yet completely hopeful.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 12:24 am (UTC)No word as of yet, and I don't think it'll happen any time soon. The first two were in real time -- 9 years apart in movies as well as in RL -- and the last one was only about 2-3 years ago.
And "hopelessly romantic" is right. Why do you suppose I love travel so much? *grin*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 07:57 pm (UTC)it was so depressing! who wants to see all the characters whither away and die? i also found the end of angel extremely unsatisfying. clearly, we should never produce a show together :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:34 am (UTC)I can live without a completely tidy conclusion--but I still want emotional satisfaction. There's a difference--I hope he knows what it is.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:52 pm (UTC)I do not think we have anything to worry about in regards to getting an emotionally satisfying completion to BSG - especially since they are going out on their own terms. Just like The Sopranos did.
That said: what you, or I, or any other individual fan needs answers/resolutions to in BSG, may or may not be on the priority list for TPTB and the stories they want to tell in the final season. I'm just sayin'... *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 11:23 pm (UTC)You're right about what individual fans needing may not be where the priorities of TPTB lie too... I honestly have no clue WHERE their priorities lie since they've jumped around a lot over the three seasons. ;-) I do think though that in the overall storytelling terms, they'll need to give us some answers regarding the Cylons (who is the final model? how are the Final Four different? what's the significance/fate of the hybrids? etc) and on reaching Earth. But at a character level, I think things are a lot foggier--we all have characters we prefer over others, but TPTB may well not give them the attention we'd like in the final arc. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 12:41 pm (UTC)ACK!!!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 03:54 pm (UTC)